Can you show me the dialogue?


Last week, dear scrutineer, I was talking to Chairperson Alex, and she had been pondering how to demonstrate that her scrutiny committee had been effective. “Can you show me the dialogue?” I asked. What do you mean? She said. Well, if it’s helpful, this was the thinking that I shared with her.

If your scrutiny work is being assessed, peer reviewed or, for better or worse, inspected, what kinds of things do you think the assessors, reviewers or, for better or worse, the inspectors, might be looking for?

Well one thing they might well be looking for is a dialogue between the executive and scrutiny. After all, as the scientists will tell you, we can all be influenced by dialogue.

Personally I’d say there are three levels of this.

First, I’d be looking to see dialogue between cabinet members and committee members in the scrutiny meetings that I observe. I’d want to see more than simply answers to questions (these can be value in this of course if it provides assurance that the executive member is on top of their brief). I’d be looking out for follow up questions and some back-and-forth so that new understandings and ideas develop. On both sides.

Less like an interview and more like a conversation.

Second, I’d want to see what gets captured through minutes, agendas and reports. At scrutiny, cabinet and council. I’d be looking for concerns and recommendations from scrutiny that have been responded to by the executive with scrutiny responding again in turn.

I’d be looking for an audit trail of what I’ve heard described as the feedback loop between scrutiny and executive.

Third, because we know that productive, professional relationships depend upon informal as well as formal contact, so I’d be looking for evidence of this taking place. Maybe briefings between scrutiny chairs and executive members, maybe executive members joining scrutiny work planning conversations and maybe scrutiny support officers talking to senior officers or the executives themselves. I’ve heard examples of all of these in different councils.

Alex seemed happy that her scrutiny committee would be able to “show me the dialogue” if I ever asked. At least to a degree.

But what about you, dear scrutineer? If an assessor, a reviewer or, for better or worse, an inspector, came to you and said “show me the dialogue”, what will you show them?

#scrutiny #dearscrutineer #reflection

By the way, you can see/add any comments to this post on LinkedIn here.

Dear scrutineer,

Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.

Read more from Dear scrutineer,

The other day I was speaking to Cabinet Member Kate and asked her if there were any scrutiny councillors that got her attention more than others. Sure, she said, some definitely have the credibility factor. Maybe I shouldn’t, but I listen more when they speak. Wanting to know more about this ‘credibility factor’ I asked her to explain it. Well, she said, It’s not any one single thing. I’m not sure I can describe it exactly. I suggested she pick some examples to see if we could make sense of...

As you know, dear scrutineer, I do like a metaphor, and I’d like you to try this one for size: local government scrutiny as an iceberg. The idea is a simple one, the public meetings are visible, but more than two thirds of the work is done below the surface and can’t be seen from outside This reflects a relational view of scrutiny where most of the effort is put into the informal working and relationship building that creates the conditions for the public meetings to be productive. Rather...

So, dear new scrutineer, it’s your first proper scrutiny committee meeting. You were elected for the first time about two months ago and everything is still strange and unfamiliar. I wonder what you are feeling as you look around the faces of your fellow committee members, as they chat away, waiting for the meeting to start. Expectant? Confused? Worried even? Looking down, there is your agenda. Did it make sense when you looked through it? Did you form a plan of action? Decide what you wanted...