|
Do you ever think about scrutiny as reflective practice? I mentioned it in a development session I was facilitating the other day and it seemed to strike a chord. So, I thought I might share a reflection! To start with, as I’m sure you appreciate, scrutiny operates in a complex world and there is no simple manual to help guide you. And, as we’ve mentioned before, whilst every committee, council and place is different, so each is also in a constant state of change. What worked in one place and at one time might not necessarily work somewhere else or sometime else. So, it really helps to keep adapting and it really helps to keep thinking. It really helps to keep reflecting. Reflective practice is something you might have come across in health, education or social care. It usually means looking back and thinking about a recent experience and examining it in a critical way. It can also mean being thoughtful about what you are doing ‘in the moment’, although that’s harder I’d say. Often people will use a framework to help them with their reflective practice and there are many to choose from. I like the ‘Framework for Reflective Practice’ by Rolfe et al (2001) and this can be easily adapted to use in the scrutiny context. It follows this simple structure: WHAT? (What was the activity? What went well and how did we/I help? What was challenging and how did we/I respond? What was the result?) SO WHAT? (What might we/I have done differently? What did we/I learn?) NOW WHAT? (What will we/I do differently in future? What else do we/I need to address in terms of our/my development?) I also enjoy hearing about how people like to reflect. For example:
Maybe there are other examples that you know about? In closing, let me leave you with three questions that you might reflect on:
As usual, I've posted this on LinkedIn. You can find it here in case you would like to see/add any comments. P.S. This is my last email for the summer. I'll be back with more weekly reflections in September. |
Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.
“What’s the best structure for scrutiny? And why is it the single committee system?” This is what Chairperson Alex said to me last week and, although she was half joking, I think I agree with her. So, if you are looking to review your scrutiny arrangements, involved in creating a new council or just wondering if your structure is the right one, see if my thinking stacks up for you. I’d say, the single committee system is best for scrutiny because: It’s more strategic. A single committee gets...
How does scrutiny actually make a difference? What are the exact mechanisms through which scrutiny influences the executive? It’s a tricky topic but here are ten suggestions. See if they ring true for you. I’m looking at this from a realist perspective. This is an approach that encourages us to identify the social mechanisms that might explain how a particular programme might achieve its outcomes. Take the example of CCTV in car parks, discussed by Pawson and Tilley in their book Realistic...
Dear scrutineer, see what you think about this scenario. It’s the end of the item on the transport strategy and Vice Chair Jo is inviting the scrutiny committee to agree some conclusions and recommendations. Councillor Lewis has his hand up.“Can we recommend that we have a briefing note on the active travel plan, please?” There is the briefest hint of a frown on Jo’s face, but she catches it before anyone notices. “Yes, we can certainly put that in the mix, Councillor Lewis.” She’s conflicted...