|
I hope you had a good summer. I've certainly had a good summer break and now I'm looking forward to a new season for these ‘Dear Scrutineer’ reflections. So, welcome back to my existing subscribers and hello to those who have joined recently - I hope you all find these emails useful. And I thought I’d start with a mini annual report. Between September, when I started, and July, I shared 40 reflections via this email and on LinkedIn. It's interesting to see what resonated, so here are the five most engaged with posts on LinkedIn:
I’m pleased that I’ve managed to share about one a week although I’m also thinking that one reflection every two weeks might be abetter pace. I’ve found it a helpful process for my own reflection and thinking and I’ve also learnt a lot from the comments and feedback. It's also been fun mixing up the formats. As well as thoughts and short stories I've also shared poems and even a prayer. In terms of improvement, I’d like the topics to resonate more perhaps. The ‘bugbears’ and dilemmas seem to get more engagement than the ‘bigger picture’ reflections. So maybe more of that? So, dear scrutineeer, how might these reflections be more useful for you? Are there any dilemmas or topics you would find it helpful for me to cover? Perhaps there is something you are thinking about now? Let me know by reply 🙏 P.S. If you want to add/see comments on the LinkedIn version of this email you can find it here. |
Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.
“What’s the best structure for scrutiny? And why is it the single committee system?” This is what Chairperson Alex said to me last week and, although she was half joking, I think I agree with her. So, if you are looking to review your scrutiny arrangements, involved in creating a new council or just wondering if your structure is the right one, see if my thinking stacks up for you. I’d say, the single committee system is best for scrutiny because: It’s more strategic. A single committee gets...
How does scrutiny actually make a difference? What are the exact mechanisms through which scrutiny influences the executive? It’s a tricky topic but here are ten suggestions. See if they ring true for you. I’m looking at this from a realist perspective. This is an approach that encourages us to identify the social mechanisms that might explain how a particular programme might achieve its outcomes. Take the example of CCTV in car parks, discussed by Pawson and Tilley in their book Realistic...
Dear scrutineer, see what you think about this scenario. It’s the end of the item on the transport strategy and Vice Chair Jo is inviting the scrutiny committee to agree some conclusions and recommendations. Councillor Lewis has his hand up.“Can we recommend that we have a briefing note on the active travel plan, please?” There is the briefest hint of a frown on Jo’s face, but she catches it before anyone notices. “Yes, we can certainly put that in the mix, Councillor Lewis.” She’s conflicted...