|
It’s the 31st October and the scrutiny committee are on their annual Halloween trick or treat night out. Let's see how it goes. First off, you’ve got to admire their costumes. You can see all sorts of scrutiny ghouls. There is death by PowerPoint, the ‘devil in the detail’, the monster agenda, a zombie question and one, dressed in a sheet with holes cut for eyes, has come as the ghost of the committee system. There is even Pennywise the clown. Maybe for budget scrutiny I guess. Spooky! Scary! As every year, they’ve come to Executive Member Avenue which is lined, of course, with executive houses. There are pumpkins and frightening decorations outside each one including ‘for information’ reports and ‘apologies for absence’. The committee, open briefcases ready, knock on the first door. “Trick or treat!?” The door opens but this time it’s a trick! The executive member responds with a scripted answer. Oh no! Briefcases empty, the committee move on. The next door and this time it’s a treat. The executive member carefully considers the question. “Mmm, trick or treat?” She ponders. “Well, it’s an interesting one that’s been a bit of a dilemma for me. On the one hand, I feel like I’ve got everything I need to proceed with the policy I’ve got in mind and yet, on the other hand, some extra assurance never goes amiss. I’d welcome your thoughts.” Delighted with this response, the committee members drop it into their briefcases and go next door and knock. Ah, another trick, sadly. The executive member has sent an officer to the door with a ‘technical answer’ whilst they remain inside. But better luck next door! “Actually, I’ve got some really challenging issues with one of our services and it’s not easy to see a way forward.” He says. “Could we talk about the committee possibly getting involved? I know you have done work in this area before and have some good connections.” Pleased with this treat, the committee moves on. In fact, they receive many more treats than tricks through the course of the evening and return to the town hall with briefcases full of challenging issues and constructive conversations. But what about you, dear scrutineer? The next time you knock on the executive members door, will it be trick or treat? If you would like to see/add comment on this post, you can find it on LinkedIn here. |
Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.
“What’s the best structure for scrutiny? And why is it the single committee system?” This is what Chairperson Alex said to me last week and, although she was half joking, I think I agree with her. So, if you are looking to review your scrutiny arrangements, involved in creating a new council or just wondering if your structure is the right one, see if my thinking stacks up for you. I’d say, the single committee system is best for scrutiny because: It’s more strategic. A single committee gets...
How does scrutiny actually make a difference? What are the exact mechanisms through which scrutiny influences the executive? It’s a tricky topic but here are ten suggestions. See if they ring true for you. I’m looking at this from a realist perspective. This is an approach that encourages us to identify the social mechanisms that might explain how a particular programme might achieve its outcomes. Take the example of CCTV in car parks, discussed by Pawson and Tilley in their book Realistic...
Dear scrutineer, see what you think about this scenario. It’s the end of the item on the transport strategy and Vice Chair Jo is inviting the scrutiny committee to agree some conclusions and recommendations. Councillor Lewis has his hand up.“Can we recommend that we have a briefing note on the active travel plan, please?” There is the briefest hint of a frown on Jo’s face, but she catches it before anyone notices. “Yes, we can certainly put that in the mix, Councillor Lewis.” She’s conflicted...