Why a scrutiny conference is like a box of chocolates


I’m looking forward to the Centre for Governance and Scrutiny Annual Conference next month and I hope you are too.

Have you been before? Do you find these types of events useful? I certainly do. I think I’ve been to maybe seven or eight over the last 15 years.

The first one held by the Centre for Public Scrutiny (as it was then) must have been around 2003, although I reckon my first one was 2010 - the legendary ‘Accountability Works’ event at the historic Brewery venue near the Barbican in London.

You can still find the brochure online including details of an officer and member development day, an exhibition, a gala dinner, the Good Scrutiny awards ceremony and something called Scrutiny Exchange Live!

I can’t say I actually remember much about this one, although I have some shaky pictures, including of a very glamorous looking stage featuring the ‘Accountability Works’ logo in all of its splendour.

I also have some pictures of a workshop on Scrutiny and Academia with Dr Mark Ewbank, who was at INLOGOV at the time. The pictures are from behind the ’top table’ so I’m guessing I was chairing. I hope it was a good one.

Most times I was running a workshop at these conferences, and I’ve covered a lot of the scrutiny staples over the years including ‘measuring impact’, ‘task and finish groups’ and ‘engaging residents’. Maybe you went to one? I hope you found it useful if you did.

And, if you have been to one or more CFGS conferences over the years, have you taken away something helpful?

Perhaps a useful piece of news or an insight from a speaker that you’ve taken back and discussed with your committee or team?

Perhaps a new way of addressing a pressing challenge that you picked up from a workshop?

Perhaps something from the day sparked a new idea or a change in your thinking?

Perhaps you met someone over lunch or in a workshop who has been a really useful source of help and support ever since?

Perhaps you came away with a ‘spring in your scrutiny step’, simply from being together with the scrutiny collective, and being reminded that everyone is finding things tough, just the same as you are?

And maybe you also liked coming away with a new report on a useful topic, a pen, some sticky notes or some other scrutiny ‘merch’?

Of course, a bit like what Mrs Gump said, a conference is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you are going to get. But that’s part of the joy of it for me, it’s a big, unpredictable conversation all about scrutiny.

Anyhow, here is the link to the CFGS conference, happening on 20th March in Birmingham: https://www.cfgs.org.uk/cfgs-conference-2025/

Hope to see you there. 🙏

Dear scrutineer,

Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.

Read more from Dear scrutineer,

I’ve sometimes been asked to give advice about scrutiny best practice. What I’ll say is sorry, I’m not sure there is any. Even good practice might be a bit of a stretch. Let me explain in case this sounds strange. The key thing here is context. I’ve seen enough scrutiny to know that everywhere is different. The places are different, the councils are different, the committees are different, the people are different, the rules are different and perhaps most important of all, the cultures are...

I know it’s hard to make time, but now it’s spring, are you giving any thought to how your committee will get started in the next municipal year? And have you considered having a conversation about how everyone might work together?Maybe it’s not a priority and I can understand that. You might have elections and inductions and then there is committee memberships, setting dates and work planning. A lot to do!And maybe there’s no obvious need to think about team development for the committee....

Councillor Bob doesn’t go to scrutiny committee pre-meetings. He says he’s happy to do his own thing and doesn’t need telling what to do. This is a problem for Vice Chair Jo, though, as she thinks that pre-meetings are really important. But what do you think? Let me tell you a little more. Jo thinks that it’s better if everyone goes to the pre-meeting. Her committee gets together for 30 minutes before the formal meeting to agree who is going to lead on what questions and to pick up anything...