|
Showing you’ve made a difference is a tough one, isn’t it? Last week, thinking about next month’s Centre for Governance and Scrutiny (CfGS) conference, I was visited by the ghosts of workshops past. Here's to the joy of workshops! The link for the CfGS conference is here: https://www.cfgs.org.uk/panel-members-and-workshop-hosts-at-the-cfgs-conference/ |
Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.
It’s the 31st October and the scrutiny committee are on their annual Halloween trick or treat night out. Let's see how it goes. First off, you’ve got to admire their costumes. You can see all sorts of scrutiny ghouls. There is death by PowerPoint, the ‘devil in the detail’, the monster agenda, a zombie question and one, dressed in a sheet with holes cut for eyes, has come as the ghost of the committee system. There is even Pennywise the clown. Maybe for budget scrutiny I guess. Spooky! Scary!...
“What’s the best structure for scrutiny? And why is it the single committee system?” This is what Chairperson Alex said to me last week and, although she was half joking, I think I agree with her. So, if you are looking to review your scrutiny arrangements, involved in creating a new council or just wondering if your structure is the right one, see if my thinking stacks up for you. I’d say, the single committee system is best for scrutiny because: It’s more strategic. A single committee gets...
How does scrutiny actually make a difference? What are the exact mechanisms through which scrutiny influences the executive? It’s a tricky topic but here are ten suggestions. See if they ring true for you. I’m looking at this from a realist perspective. This is an approach that encourages us to identify the social mechanisms that might explain how a particular programme might achieve its outcomes. Take the example of CCTV in car parks, discussed by Pawson and Tilley in their book Realistic...