profile

Dear scrutineer,

Demonstrating the impact of scrutiny

Published over 1 year ago • 1 min read

Showing you’ve made a difference is a tough one, isn’t it? Last week, thinking about next month’s Centre for Governance and Scrutiny (CfGS) conference, I was visited by the ghosts of workshops past.
​
Back in 2018 I hosted a workshop on demonstrating the impact of scrutiny, maybe you were there? And, as I know this is something that plays on your mind from time to time, I thought it was worth revisiting.
​
It’s always nice to hear about what’s already working for people and so we spent time making lists. I love making lists in groups - there is something so useful about it. You remember things you’d forgotten, you get inspiration from others and new ideas are sparked.
​
Anyhow, Here are thirty things that people in the workshop came up with on the question of ‘what do we do as scrutineers that helps to demonstrate impact?
​
I came across it the other day and thought it worth sharing just in case there is one thing here that will make you say “ah, ok, that’s interesting…”
​
​Things that help scrutineers to demonstrate impact​
​
1. Producing an annual report
2. Having agendas that are focussed on outcomes
3. Press releases
4. Articles in the council magazine
5. Webcasting meetings so the public can see what scrutiny is doing
6. Involving all councillors in scrutiny work so they are able to share impact
7. Chairs of scrutiny using internal comms to share messages
8. Holding workshops to involve staff and share impact
9. Highlighting recommendations and intended outcomes on the work programme
10. Chairs speak at council meetings about what scrutiny has achieved
11. Impact and outcomes highlighted specifically in scrutiny reports
12. Outreach and focus groups to talk to the public (with tea and biscuits)
13. Training for staff about scrutiny so they know how it makes a difference
14. Site visits — to be visible to the public
15. Public Q&A sessions
16. Using social media to share impact
17. Following up recommendations to understand what difference has been made
18. Involving the public in work planning events — so we align to public concerns
19. Working with cooptees — they can share impact
20. Communications strategy for scrutiny
21. Getting feedback from people that they have responded to scrutiny
22. Showing scrutiny responds to public concerns i.e. from residents groups
23. Sharing the number / impact of call-ins
24. Allowing public questions and social media at meetings to let people see what scrutiny is doing
25. Analysis of task and finish work to show what difference it has made
26. Inviting media to meetings
27. Using a recommendations tracker
28. Capturing media reports about scrutiny work
29. Having conversations with partners about the difference scrutiny has made
30. Public consultation on what scrutiny has done / should be doing
​

Here's to the joy of workshops!

The link for the CfGS conference is here: https://www.cfgs.org.uk/panel-members-and-workshop-hosts-at-the-cfgs-conference/​

Dear scrutineer,

Here are some reflections that I hope you will find helpful. They are mainly about local government and parliamentary scrutiny, but I hope that these ideas are useful for the wider scrutiny collective. Yours, Dr Dave Mckenna

Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.

Read more from Dear scrutineer,

Last week, dear scrutineer, I was talking to Chairperson Alex, and she had been pondering how to demonstrate that her scrutiny committee had been effective. “Can you show me the dialogue?” I asked. What do you mean? She said. Well, if it’s helpful, this was the thinking that I shared with her. If your scrutiny work is being assessed, peer reviewed or, for better or worse, inspected, what kinds of things do you think the assessors, reviewers or, for better or worse, the inspectors, might be...

10 days ago • 1 min read

The other day I was speaking to Cabinet Member Kate and asked her if there were any scrutiny councillors that got her attention more than others. Sure, she said, some definitely have the credibility factor. Maybe I shouldn’t, but I listen more when they speak. Wanting to know more about this ‘credibility factor’ I asked her to explain it. Well, she said, It’s not any one single thing. I’m not sure I can describe it exactly. I suggested she pick some examples to see if we could make sense of...

2 months ago • 1 min read

As you know, dear scrutineer, I do like a metaphor, and I’d like you to try this one for size: local government scrutiny as an iceberg. The idea is a simple one, the public meetings are visible, but more than two thirds of the work is done below the surface and can’t be seen from outside This reflects a relational view of scrutiny where most of the effort is put into the informal working and relationship building that creates the conditions for the public meetings to be productive. Rather...

3 months ago • 1 min read