Is scrutiny a magnifying glass or a spotlight? Or maybe something else?
|
What’s a good image for scrutiny? The law has scales to represent it, but what might you choose for scrutiny? A magnifying glass or a spotlight perhaps? Or maybe something else? If you have ever been asked to design a logo for scrutiny or find an image to put on a scrutiny annual report, then you will have thought about this. Actually, it’s not easy to find a good one. Usually, it’s a magnifying glass. A simple enough idea - scrutiny examines in detail and looks carefully. But it’s not perfect (of course!). The magnifying glass only works when something is put in front of it. It’s no good for exploring the wider landscape or finding something new. When, many years ago, we were choosing an image for our scrutiny function, we chose a spotlight. It’s a complex world out there and it’s hard to see everything that’s going on and so there are many things that do not get the attention that they should. The spotlight suggests that scrutiny is shining a light on things that might otherwise remain obscured. Of course, scrutiny might be a magnifying glass or a spotlight at different times. And maybe it’s useful to think about what this might mean for how scrutiny operates. Beyond logos and report covers, thinking about images for scrutiny can have a wider benefit. Using metaphors has been a staple of organisational research for many years. It can be a nice way to unlock some new thinking and different insights. I was reminded about this at the recent Centre for Governance and Scrutiny conference, where Catherine Howe described scrutiny as a scaffold. That image certainly got me thinking and I made this list: Scrutiny is like a scaffold because:
And you might use it in your scrutiny work as well. Maybe in a team meeting or a development conversation with the committee? You can ask ’what’s an image that represents scrutiny?’ And then, ‘Scrutiny is like [that thing] because?’ I bet there are some really interesting metaphors to be found. I mean, what’s an image for scrutiny that works for you? And why is scrutiny like that thing? |
Dear scrutineer,
Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.
Dear scrutineer, here is a quote that really affected me the first time I read it. You might also find that it gives you pause for thought. It comes from Tony Whatling and his 2012 book ‘Mediation skills and strategies’: “In real-life conflict and dispute resolution…, being listened to and understood emerges universally as almost more important than winning the dispute Tony Whatling is someone who had a wealth of experience in mediation and is talking here about people involved in sometimes...
I was having a catch up with Chairperson Alex the other day, and the subject of induction for scrutiny councillors came up. I thought he had a few interesting points, so I wanted to share them. If you have elections round the corner or new councillors coming onto your committee next municipal year, maybe you’ll find them useful. Alex doesn’t like the word induction, by the way, he says it sounds a bit too medical. He prefers ‘introduction’ in the sense of ‘you are meeting scrutiny and we are...
Councillor Smith has an officer draft his questions for him to read out at scrutiny committee meetings. But Vice Chair Jo doesn’t like it at all. What do you think? When I asked Councillor Smith about it, he told me that it gave him more confidence as the officer support is very good. He knows that it will be a question worth asking and he doesn’t always have time to work on the questions himself - scrutiny committee starts at 6.00 and he barely has time to get there from work, let alone have...