|
Dear scrutineer, So, I just wanted to drop you a line to say how valuable your work is. I hope people around you appreciate the contribution you make and the time you put in. I hope they know itâs not easy. And, if you do have a moment to reflect, I hope you can give yourself a big pat on the back for the difference that you make. Some people think you just turn up to meetings and make speeches! But we both know it's not that at all. They don't appreciate the time you take reading through those piles of papers and the time you spend carefully listening to all those different voices. Itâs that understanding and that listening that helps you to ask those important questions. And itâs those questions, and the conversations that follow, that help keep the system on the rails. You get things in the open, you keep decision makersâ feet on the ground and sometimes you even find some room for improvement. And yes, I know, sometimes this all goes unnoticed. As we both know, scrutiny work can fly under the radar and itâs perhaps hardest to see when itâs working well. Good scrutiny has a preventative effect so folks might not notice it at all, but decision makers know itâs there and it gives them food for thought. It helps makes things better just by being there. Also, scrutiny doesnât always get the credit it deserves. After all, scrutiny is not in the front of peopleâs minds as other public services might be. I mean, people donât really know what it is, do they? When people ask what you do do and you say âIâm on a scrutiny committeeâ or âI support scrutinyâ thereâs that blank look that we all know so well. You might say âerr, do you know what an select committee is?â, but that doesnât really help either. But scrutiny IS a public service and a vitally important one. And itâs not easy. From my role supporting scrutiny over the years, if I know anything itâs that no one gets it right all of the time. Thereâs no single set of instructions for scrutiny. Itâs a constant process of learning and developing, of trial and error. And yet, for all the frustration, I know there have been successes, moments youâve been pleased about, work youâve been proud of and differences youâve made. Please take a moment to reflect on those positives if you can. So, despite all the challenges, and despite the occasional indifference, I hope you can keep plugging away, keep trying new things and keep reflecting. After all, we canât have good governance without the work you do. I hope it was useful to hear this đ |
Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.
Dear scrutineer, here is a quote that really affected me the first time I read it. You might also find that it gives you pause for thought. It comes from Tony Whatling and his 2012 book âMediation skills and strategiesâ: âIn real-life conflict and dispute resolutionâŚ, being listened to and understood emerges universally as almost more important than winning the dispute Tony Whatling is someone who had a wealth of experience in mediation and is talking here about people involved in sometimes...
I was having a catch up with Chairperson Alex the other day, and the subject of induction for scrutiny councillors came up. I thought he had a few interesting points, so I wanted to share them. If you have elections round the corner or new councillors coming onto your committee next municipal year, maybe youâll find them useful. Alex doesnât like the word induction, by the way, he says it sounds a bit too medical. He prefers âintroductionâ in the sense of âyou are meeting scrutiny and we are...
Councillor Smith has an officer draft his questions for him to read out at scrutiny committee meetings. But Vice Chair Jo doesnât like it at all. What do you think? When I asked Councillor Smith about it, he told me that it gave him more confidence as the officer support is very good. He knows that it will be a question worth asking and he doesnât always have time to work on the questions himself - scrutiny committee starts at 6.00 and he barely has time to get there from work, let alone have...