The usual suspects


Here’s conversation I had with Vice Chair Jo last week about involving the public in scrutiny. We started by talking about the ‘usual suspects’ of course.

Jo “Yes, it really bothers me when people say we have to go beyond the usual suspects in our scrutiny work. I mean, I think that’s all they notice from the outside, those same faces standing up and asking questions at committee meetings. I mean, don’t get me wrong, it can be hard hearing the same points over again, but you have to admire anyone who doesn’t get put off by the bureaucracy of it all, right?

Me “Yeah, I get that, I’ve heard people being described as ‘experienced activists’ instead* which fits I think. I have a friend Alex, who’s a chair, who always takes time to talk to anyone who comes to ask a question. He tells me he’s learnt a lot about how scrutiny really works that way.


Jo “Ah, nice. But it isn’t just that. We’ve done so many things over the years to get people involved and some have worked really well. I wish people would focus on that more.


Me “Like what?


Jo “Well, we always like to get out and meet people when we do task and finish. We’ve been to youth clubs, carers’ centres, we even went to the high street with clip boards and grabbed people! And folks will always talk to you if it’s an issue they’re already worried about.


Me “I do wonder if a lot of stuff gets forgotten. You must have done so much over the years?


Jo “Sure. You’d probably have to ask some of the organisations we work with when we set things up. People like Age Concern and Shelter probably have a better handle on what we’ve done in the past than we have!


Me “Sounds like working with these outside bodies has helped then?


Jo “Oh it definitely has. I mean otherwise you are just sending out invitations into the ether. I mean, it helps so much to have organisations on your side that people know and trust, that they have a connection with. I do try and keep those relationships going if I can, even if it’s just grabbing someone after a meeting.


Me “And do you get any other help?


Jo “We had a fantastic community engagement team that we were able to work with and youth workers when we had them. You can still usually find someone that has engagement in their role, even if you have to look a bit harder these days.


Me “Ah, I’m guessing you don’t have everything you need in the support team, so you have to be creative?


Jo “That’s right. And we try not to forget that our councillors have a lot of ongoing contacts with residents and some of that is really helpful. Although, now I think of it, we could do more to collect that.


But yeah, it’s not always easy, getting people involved, which is why I’m grateful for those people who will come and talk to us, even if my colleagues don’t always see it exactly the same way. Experienced activist did you say?


Me “Yes.


Jo “I think I’ll use that. Thanks. Sorry, I’ve got a meeting…


*Beresford, P (2013) Beyond the usual suspects. Towards inclusive user involvement https://shapingourlives.org.uk/report/beyond-the-usual-suspects-research-report/

Dear scrutineer,

Get reflections like this straight to your inbox. I also share them on LinkedIn.

Read more from Dear scrutineer,

I was having a catch up with Chairperson Alex the other day, and the subject of induction for scrutiny councillors came up. I thought he had a few interesting points, so I wanted to share them. If you have elections round the corner or new councillors coming onto your committee next municipal year, maybe you’ll find them useful. Alex doesn’t like the word induction, by the way, he says it sounds a bit too medical. He prefers ‘introduction’ in the sense of ‘you are meeting scrutiny and we are...

Councillor Smith has an officer draft his questions for him to read out at scrutiny committee meetings. But Vice Chair Jo doesn’t like it at all. What do you think? When I asked Councillor Smith about it, he told me that it gave him more confidence as the officer support is very good. He knows that it will be a question worth asking and he doesn’t always have time to work on the questions himself - scrutiny committee starts at 6.00 and he barely has time to get there from work, let alone have...

Dear scrutineer, here’s a question for you. Can you describe the difference between assurance and reassurance? Imagine that one day you are being interviewed by an inspector and they ask ‘how do you seek assurance? Or ’what gives you confidence that things are running as they should be?’ What might you reply? And my view? Well I’d start with this: Reassurance means that someone told me something and I trusted they were right. It’s a feeling. Assurance, on the other hand, means I’ve got good...